ASSESSMENT OF DIGITAL TRADE ENTERPRISES READINESS FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IMPLEMENTATION: RESULTS OF AN EXPERT SURVEY
Abstract
The accelerating integration of artificial intelligence into business operations represents one of the most significant transformations in contemporary commerce. For digital trade enterprises, driven artificial intelligence tools offer opportunities to enhance efficiency, personalise customer interactions, and optimise inventory and pricing decisions. Yet despite growing availability of such solutions, a considerable share of implementation initiatives fail to deliver anticipated outcomes. Organisations frequently attempt to integrate artificial intelligence without a systematic understanding of their own preparedness, which leads to misaligned investments and unrealised potential. Organisational readiness for artificial intelligence adoption encompasses far more than adequate hardware or software. It extends to strategic alignment of management decisions, adaptability of human resources, data governance maturity, and understanding of ethical and regulatory requirements. When any of these dimensions remains underdeveloped, even well-resourced artificial intelligence initiatives are prone to underperformance or failure. Small and medium-sized enterprises in the digital trade sector face particularly complex challenges. Unlike large corporations, smaller businesses navigate artificial intelligence adoption with constrained resources, limited specialist expertise, and a pressing need for rapid returns on investment. Their specific readiness profile — strengths, critical gaps, and priority areas — remains insufficiently studied, particularly within the Ukrainian market context. This article examines digital trade enterprise readiness across four interconnected dimensions: technological infrastructure, organisational capacity, human capital, and ethical-legal compliance. The study aims to produce a comprehensive diagnostic picture, identify the most critical barriers to effective artificial intelligence implementation, and highlight application areas with the greatest practical potential. Such an assessment enables enterprises to sequence adoption steps logically, address foundational weaknesses before scaling, and select pathways achievable given their current organisational maturity.
References
Aldoseri A., Al-Khalifa K. N., Hamouda A. M. Methodological approach to assessing the current state of organizations for AI-based digital transformation. Applied System Innovation. 2024. Vol. 7. № 1. Art. 14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/asi7010014
Tursunbayeva A., Chalutz-Ben Gal H. Adoption of artificial intelligence : a TOP framework-based checklist for digital leaders. Business Horizons. 2024. Vol. 67. № 4. P. 357–368. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2024.04.006
Palade V., Carutasu G. Organizational readiness for artificial intelligence adoption. International Journal of Computers, Communications & Control. 2023. Vol. 18. № 3. P. 30–35.
Cubric M. Drivers, barriers and social considerations for AI adoption in business and management : a tertiary study. Technology in Society. 2020. Vol. 62. Art. 101257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101257
Hansen H. F., Lillesund E., Mikalef P., Altwaijry N. Understanding artificial intelligence diffusion through an AI capability maturity model. Information Systems Frontiers. 2024. Vol. 26. № 6. P. 2147–2163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-024-10528-4
Клименко В. М. Методичне підґрунтя оцінки готовності цифрових підприємств до впровадження технологій штучного інтелекту. Бізнес-навігатор. 2025. Вип. 3 (80). С. 429–434. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/business-navigator.80-73
Singla A., Sukharevsky A., Yee L., Chui M. The state of AI in 2025 : agents, innovation, and transformation. McKinsey & Company. 2025. URL: https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/quantumblack/our-insights/the-state-of-ai
Asaftei G. M., Roberts R., Sticha A., Prinsen C. State of AI trust in 2026 : Shifting to the agentic era. McKinsey & Company. 2026. URL: https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/tech-and-ai/our-insights/tech-forward/state-of-ai-trust-in-2026-shifting-to-the-agentic-era
Польова Т.В. Застосування штучного інтелекту в аналітиці бізнес-процесів компаній. Бізнес-навігатор. 2026. Вип. 2 (85). С. 149–154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/business-navigator.85-23
Singla A., Sukharevsky A., Yee L., Chui M., Hall B. The state of AI in early 2024 : gen AI adoption spikes and starts to generate value. McKinsey & Company. 2024. URL: https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/quantumblack/our-insights/the-state-of-ai-2024
Relyea C., Maor D., Durth S., Bouly J. Gen AI's next inflection point : from employee experimentation to organizational transformation. McKinsey & Company. 2024. URL: https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/people-and-organizational-performance/our-insights/gen-ais-next-inflection-point-from-employee-experimentation-to-organizational-transformation
Aldoseri A., Al-Khalifa K. N., Hamouda A. M. (2024). Methodological approach to assessing the current state of organizations for AI-based digital transformation. Applied System Innovation, 7(1), Article 14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/asi7010014
Tursunbayeva A., Chalutz-Ben Gal H. (2024). Adoption of artificial intelligence: A TOP framework-based checklist for digital leaders. Business Horizons, 67(4), 357–368. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2024.04.006
Palade V., Carutasu G. (2023). Organizational readiness for artificial intelligence adoption. International Journal of Computers, Communications & Control, 18(3), 30–35. Available at: https://surl.li/kywqep (accessed April 10, 2026).
Cubric M. (2020). Drivers, barriers and social considerations for AI adoption in business and management: A tertiary study. Technology in Society, 62, Article 101257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101257
Hansen H. F., Lillesund E., Mikalef P., Altwaijry N. (2024). Understanding artificial intelligence diffusion through an AI capability maturity model. Information Systems Frontiers, 26(6), 2147–2163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-024-10528-4
Klymenko, V. M. (2025). Metodychne pidgruntia otsinky hotovnosti tsyfrovykh pidpryiemstv do vprovadzhennia tekhnolohii shtuchnoho intelektu [Methodological approach to evaluating artificial intelligence readiness in digital enterprises]. Business Navigator, 3(80), 429–434. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/business-navigator.80-73
Singla A., Sukharevsky A., Yee L., Chui M. (2025). The state of AI in 2025: Agents, innovation, and transformation. McKinsey & Company. Available at: https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/quantumblack/our-insights/the-state-of-ai
Asaftei G. M., Roberts R., Sticha A., Prinsen C. (2026). State of AI trust in 2026: Shifting to the agentic era. McKinsey & Company. Available at: https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/tech-and-ai/our-insights/tech-forward/state-of-ai-trust-in-2026-shifting-to-the-agentic-era
Polova, T. V. (2026). Zastosuvannia shtuchnoho intelektu v analitytsi biznes-protsesiv kompanii [Application of artificial intelligence in the analysis of company business processes]. Business Navigator, 2(85), 149–154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/business-navigator.85-23
Singla A., Sukharevsky A., Yee L., Chui M., Hall, B. (2024). The state of AI in early 2024: Gen AI adoption spikes and starts to generate value. McKinsey & Company. Available at: https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/quantumblack/our-insights/the-state-of-ai-2024
Relyea C., Maor D., Durth S., Bouly J. (2024). Gen AI's next inflection point: From employee experimentation to organizational transformation. McKinsey & Company. Available at: https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/people-and-organizational-performance/our-insights/gen-ais-next-inflection-point-from-employee-experimentation-to-organizational-transformation