STRATEGIC CHANGE MANAGEMENT OF GREEN TRANSFORMATION OF TERRITORIAL COMMUNITIES: GRANT VENTURE AND DESIGN THINKING AS INSTRUMENTS OF SOCIAL COHESION

Keywords: strategic change management, grant activity, venture business, design thinking in business, social cohesion of communities, green transformation of territorial communities, social cohesion index, post-war recovery

Abstract

The article substantiates the author's original concept of strategic change management of green transformation of Ukrainian territorial communities in the context of simultaneous post-war recovery, green transition, and European integration. The study identifies a key methodological gap in current practice: communities receive grant funding, implement individual projects, yet systemic green transformation does not occur. This paradox is explained not by a shortage of resources but by the absence of a strategic change management logic capable of converting one-off projects into catalysts of sustainable institutional transformation. The article proposes to reconceptualise grant activity as a venture instrument for systemic change rather than one-time financial support. The grant venture logic implies a portfolio approach across three levels: micro-level pilot projects testing new green practices; meso-level interconnected grant clusters forming a critical mass of change; and macro-level grant portfolios guiding communities towards self-sustaining models of sustainable development. Design thinking is substantiated as a methodological bridge between change strategy and social cohesion, transforming residents from passive recipients into co-authors of green solutions through its five sequential stages: empathy, problem definition, ideation, prototyping, and testing. Social cohesion is repositioned from an expected outcome of transformation to a measurable prerequisite for its effectiveness. The authors propose the Social Cohesion Index (SCI) as an integral indicator comprising four sub-indices: institutional trust, participatory engagement, local identity, and social inclusion. A calculation methodology is proposed and piloted on a conditional example of three communities with different levels of social capital. Results confirm an inverse relationship between the SCI level and the duration of the preparatory phase of a green project, supporting the hypothesis that social cohesion is an input parameter for strategic change management. The authors' Grant Venture Green Transformation (GVGT) model integrates these elements into a four-block cyclical operational framework aligned with Kotter's eight-step change model, offering local governments a practical instrument for evidence-based planning, grant portfolio structuring, and institutional scaling of successful green pilots.

References

Kotter J.P. Leading Change. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press, 1996. 208 p.

Lewin K. Field Theory in Social Science. New York: Harper & Row, 1951. 346 p.

Putnam R.D. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2000. 541 p.

Ostrom E. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990. 280 p.

Geissdoerfer M., Savaget P., Bocken N., Hultink E.J. The Circular Economy – A New Sustainability Paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production. 2017. Vol. 143. P. 757–768. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048

Barca F., McCann P., Rodríguez-Pose A. The Case for Regional Development Intervention: Place-Based versus Place-Neutral Approaches. Journal of Regional Science. 2012. Vol. 52, № 1. P. 134–152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00756.x

Захарченко Н.В. Дизайн-мислення в бізнесі: навч. посіб. Одеса: ОНЕУ, 2024. 278 с.

European Commission. Cohesion in Europe towards 2050. Eighth Report on Economic, Social and Territorial Cohesion. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the EU, 2022. 294 p.

Meadows D.H. Thinking in Systems: A Primer. White River Junction: Chelsea Green Publishing, 2008. 218 p.

Про Основні засади (стратегію) державної екологічної політики України на період до 2030 року : Закон України № 2697-VIII від 28.02.2019 р. Рада. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2697-19#Text

Програма DREAM (Digital Restoration Ecosystem for Accountable Management). DREAM. URL: https://dream.gov.ua

Захарченко Н. В., Доброва Н. В., Журило С. С. Публічні закупівлі як інструмент розвитку малого та середнього бізнесу в Україні. Економічний простір. 2026. № 211. С. 110-115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30838/EP.211.110-115

Шестаковська Т. Л., Гололобов С. М., Гаврилечко Ю. В. Грантова діяльність і цифровізація в управлінні змінами: стратегування територіального розвитку на основі наукових досліджень, інноваційних технологій та принципів сталого розвитку. Держава та регіони. 2024. 1. С. 251-259. DOI https://doi.org/10.32782/1813-3401.2024.1.40

Kotter, J.P. (1996). Leading Change. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.

Lewin, K. (1951). Field Theory in Social Science. New York: Harper & Row.

Putnam, R.D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N., & Hultink, E.J. (2017). The Circular Economy – A New Sustainability Paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 757–768. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048

Barca, F., McCann, P., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2012). The Case for Regional Development Intervention. Journal of Regional Science, 52(1), 134–152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00756.x

Zakharchenko, N.V. (2024). Dyzain-myslennia v biznesi [Design Thinking in Business]. Odesa: ONEU. (in Ukrainian)

European Commission. (2022). Cohesion in Europe towards 2050. Eighth Report on Economic, Social and Territorial Cohesion. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the EU.

Meadows, D.H. (2008). Thinking in Systems: A Primer. White River Junction: Chelsea Green Publishing.

Pro Osnovni zasady (stratehiiu) derzhavnoi ekolohichnoi polityky Ukrainy na period do 2030 roku [On the Basic Principles (Strategy) of the State Environmental Policy of Ukraine for the Period until 2030]: Law of Ukraine No. 2697-VIII dated 28.02.2019. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2697-19#Text (in Ukrainian).

DREAM Platform (2024). Digital Restoration Ecosystem for Accountable Management. Available at: https://dream.gov.ua (accessed April 20, 2026).

Zakharchenko, N.V., Dobrova, N.V., & Zhurylo, S.S. (2026). Publichni zakupivli yak instrument rozvytku maloho ta serednoho biznesu v Ukraini [Public Procurement as an Instrument for SME Development in Ukraine]. Ekonomichnyi prostir – Economic Space, 211. (in Ukrainian)

Shestakivska, T.L., Hololobov, S.M., & Havrylchenko, Yu.V. (2024). Hrantova diialnist i tsyfrovizatsiia v upravlinni zminamy: stratehuvannii terytorialnoho rozvytku na osnovi naukovykh doslidzhen, innovatsiinykh tekhnolohii ta pryntsypiv staloho rozvytku [Grant Activity and Digitalisation in Change Management: Territorial Development Strategising Based on Research, Innovative Technologies and Sustainable Development Principles]. Derzhava ta rehiony – State and Regions, 1, 251–259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/1813-3401.2024.1.40 (in Ukrainian).

##article.numberofviews## 18
##article.numberofdownloads## 8
Published
2026-06-26