MECHANISM OF DYNAMIC ADAPTATION OF SIMULATOR PARAMETERS FOR IMPLEMENTING INDIVIDUAL-AND-TEAM STRATEGIES IN AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLER TRAINING

Keywords: air traffic controller, simulator training, adaptive learning, team competence, explainable artificial intelligence, BlueSky

Abstract

The paper presents mechanism for dynamic adaptation of simulator content aimed at implementing individual-and-team strategies in air traffic controller (ATCO) training within a competency-based learning paradigm. The relevance of the study is determined by the transition of ATCO training to ICAO- and EASA-based competency models, as well as by the need to improve simulator efficiency under increasing traffic complexity, staffing constraints, and stringent flight safety requirements. The purpose of the paper is to design mechanisms for dynamic control of simulator parameters that adapt the scenario to the individual-and-team state of trainees. The research combines systems analysis, competency-based training and assessment principles, Bayesian Knowledge Tracing for estimating the probability of mastering specific skills, and interpretable machinelearning models for explaining the team result. A cyclic six-module architecture of an adaptive simulator is proposed. It includes behaviour monitoring, diagnostics of risk and good-practice indicators, prediction of skill acquisition, dynamic scenario adaptation, explainable assessment, and post-session reporting. The study formalizes the session state vector, workload index, skill-deficit index, and the rule of wave-like complexity variation based on the logic “increase – peak – recovery”. It is shown that adaptation should be not only quantitative but also targeted: depending on the dominant deficit, the system selects a focused event from a library of scenario interventions without driving the team beyond the productive training zone. Gradient boosting models combined with SHAP analysis are proposed to explain team assessment and to identify individual, negative, positive, and compensatory contributions of team members. The practical value of the results lies in creating a foundation for a new generation of simulator systems capable of maintaining trainees in a productive workload zone in real time, generating a posttraining report for instructor, and increasing the precision of corrective pedagogical influence

References

1. ICAO. Manual on Air Traffic Controller Competency-Based Training and Assessment. Volume I – Air Traffic Control (ATC). 2nd ed. Montréal : International Civil Aviation Organization, 2022. 451 p.
2. ICAO. Procedures for Air Navigation Services – Training (PANS-TRG). 3rd ed. Montréal : International Civil Aviation Organization, 2020. 218 p.
3. Про внесення змін до Авіаційних правил України «Технічні вимоги та адміністративні процедури щодо видачі свідоцтв та сертифікатів диспетчерів управління повітряним рухом» : наказ Державної авіаційної служби України від 13.05.2025 № 256 URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0940-25 (дата звернення:
10.03.2026).
4. EUROCONTROL. Performance Review Report 2024. Executive Summary. Brussels : EUROCONTROL, 2025, 16 p.
5. EUROCONTROL. Annual Network Operations Report 2024: Final report. Brussels : EUROCONTROL, 2025. 66 p.
6. Easy Access Rules for Air Traffic Controllers’ Licensing and Certification (Regulation (EU) 2015/340). Cologne : European Union Aviation Safety Agency, 2024. 702 p.
7. EUROCONTROL. Guidelines for TRM Good Practices. Edition 1.1. Brussels : EUROCONTROL, 2015. 39 p.
8. Hu Y., Shen H., Wang B., Teng J., Guo C., Wang Y. Core Competency Assessment Model for Entry-Level Air Traffic Controllers Based on International Civil Aviation Organization Document 10056. Aerospace. 2025. Vol. 12, no. 6. 20 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace12060486
9. Duan C., Hu M., Yang L., Gao Q. Core Competency Quantitative Evaluation of Air Traffic Controller in Multi-Post Mode. Applied Sciences. 2023. Vol. 13, no. 18. 22 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app131810246
10. Antoško M., Polishchuk V., Kelemen M., Jr., Korniienko A., Kelemen M. Artificial Intelligence Technology for Assessing the Practical Knowledge of Air Traffic Controller Students Based on Their Responses in Multitasking Situations. Applied Sciences. 2025. Vol. 15, no. 1. 20 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app15010308
11. Hoskova-Mayerova S., et al. Development of a Methodology for Assessing Workload within the Air Traffic Control Environment in the Czech Republic. Sustainability. 2022. Vol. 14, no. 13. 16 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137858
12. Rodrigues S., Paiva J. S., Dias D., Aleixo M., Filipe G., Cunha J. P. S. A Wearable System for the Stress Monitoring of Air Traffic Controllers During An Air Traffic Control Refresher Training and the Trier Social Stress Test: A Comparative Study. The Open Biomedical Engineering Journal. 2018. Vol. 11. P. 106-116. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2174/1875036201811010106
13. Mathieu J. E., Rapp T. L., Maynard M. T., Mangos, P. M. Interactive effects of team and task shared mental models as related to air traffic controllers’ collective efficacy and effectiveness. Human Performance, 2010. Vol. 23, no. 1. P. 22–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08959280903400150
14. Papenfuß A. Phenotypes of Teamwork – an Exploratory Study of Tower Controller Teams. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 2013. Vol. 57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213571070
15. Palonyi A. S., Zienov D. O. Issues in the Development of an Adaptive Learning Environment for Mastering Teamwork Skills of Air Traffic Controllers // Scientific Notes of Taurida National V. I. Vernadsky University. Series: Technical Sciences. 2025. Vol. 36(75), no. 1, part 2. P. 175–183. DOI: 10.32782/2663-5941/2025.1.2/26
16. Šarić-Grgić I., Grubišić A., Gašpar A. Twenty-Five Years of Bayesian Knowledge Tracing: A Systematic Review. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction. 2024. Vol. 34, no. 4. P. 1127–1173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-023-09389-4
17. Lundberg S. M., Lee S.-I. A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), Long Beach, 4–9 December 2017. P. 4766-4777
18. Degas A., et al. A Survey on Artificial Intelligence and eXplainable AI in Air Traffic Management: Current Trends and Development with Future Research Trajectory. Applied Sciences. 2022. Vol. 12, no. 3. 47 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app12031295
19. Sanneman L., Shah J. A. The Situation Awareness Framework for Explainable AI (SAFE-AI) and Human Factors Considerations for XAI Systems. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction. 2022. Vol. 38, no. 1. P. 1772–1788. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2081282
20. Jáger R.A., Szabó G. Air Traffic Simulation Framework for Testing Automated Air Traffic Control Solutions. Applied Sciences. 2025. Vol. 15(12):6414. 22 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app15126414
21. EASA Concept Paper: Guidance for Level 1 & 2 machine-learning applications. Cologne : European Union Aviation Safety Agency, 2024. 285 p.
Published
2026-05-30
How to Cite
Palonyi , A. S., & Zienov , D. O. (2026). MECHANISM OF DYNAMIC ADAPTATION OF SIMULATOR PARAMETERS FOR IMPLEMENTING INDIVIDUAL-AND-TEAM STRATEGIES IN AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLER TRAINING. Systems and Technologies, 72(2), 320-327. https://doi.org/10.32782/2521-6643-2026-2-72.39