MATHEMATICAL MODELING OF FUZZY COMMUNICATION IN MULTI-ROBOT SYSTEMS BASED ON PSEUDOANALOG SIGNALS
Abstract
The article presents the results of a study devoted to modeling communication in multi-robot systems using fuzzy (pseudoanalog) signals. In modern conditions, when groups of autonomous robots operate in complex and dynamically changing environments, the tasks of ensuring effective, stable and energy-saving information exchange between agents are extremely relevant. Traditional approaches to inter-robot communication – mostly discrete and based on rigid binary protocols – often do not allow achieving sufficient adaptability in noisy, unstructured or resource-limited environments. They tend to rely on constant signal retransmission and error-correction procedures, which increases energy costs and reduces real-time responsiveness. In response to these challenges, the author proposed a hybrid model that imitates the principles of communication inherent in biological systems, in particular the variability and context dependence of analog signals used in flocks of birds, schools of fish or insect colonies. Such natural communication is not strictly digital: it combines amplitude, frequency and temporal modulation, enabling organisms to convey uncertainty, urgency or intent even under external disturbances. The developed mathematical model applies the concept of fuzzy logic, in which each transmitted signal is represented by three parameters – amplitude, frequency and duration – interpreted in linguistic categories such as high, medium, low, alert or coordination. Membership functions determine the degree to which a received signal corresponds to a specific linguistic value, enabling each agent to form a flexible response depending not only on the signal itself but also on the situational context. This reduces the need for exact matching of discrete messages and allows communication to remain functional even when signals are partially lost or distorted. A series of experiments was conducted in a simulation environment representing predator–prey interactions, in which “Lions” acted as pursuing agents while “Antelope” could exchange messages about detected danger or decreasing energy reserves. Three categories of environments were modeled: a basic scenario with ideal discrete communication, a scenario with partial signal loss, and one with distortion introduced during pseudoanalog transmission. The results demonstrated that the fuzzy model enables maintaining the same level of agent survival and task completion efficiency as in ideal discrete communication, while reducing overall energy consumption by approximately 18 %. Furthermore, the swarm demonstrated significantly higher robustness under conditions of interference or incomplete data, as fuzzy interpretation prevented critical communication breakdowns. The use of analog-like communication with linguistic interpretation decreases unnecessary agent activation, smooths collective decision-making and increases the overall efficiency of group behavior. The proposed model can be applied to the development of distributed technical systems for search-and-rescue missions, reconnaissance, environmental monitoring, agricultural robotics and low-cost swarm systems, where adaptability and resilience are more critical than precision. The article contributes to the advancement of flexible decentralized communication protocols capable of maintaining functionality under uncertainty and without centralized control.
References
2. Verma J. K., Ranga V. Multi-Robot Coordination Analysis, Taxonomy, Challenges and Future Scope. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems. 2021. Vol. 102. Article No. 10. DOI: 10.1007/s10846-021-01378-2
3. Rasouli S., Dautenhahn K., Nehaniv C. L. Simulation of a Bio-Inspired Flocking-Based Aggregation Behaviour in Swarm Robotics. Biomimetics. 2024. Vol. 9, No. 11. Article No. 668. DOI: 10.3390/biomimetics9110668
4. Ковтунов Ю., Макогон Г., Ісаков О., Бабкін Ю., Калінін І., Лацута Р. Використання математичного апарату нечіткої логіки для фаззіфікації та алгоритмізації роботи системи інтерактивного моніторингу транспортних комунікацій. Сучасні інформаційні системи. 2020. Т. 4, № 3. С. 64–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26906/SUNZ.2020.3.064
5. Kornienko S., Kornienko O. Minimalistic approach towards communication and perception in microrobotic swarms. Proc. IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). 2005. P. 2228–2234. DOI: 10.1109/IROS.2005.1545594
6. Kernbach S. Swarmrobot.org – Open-hardware microrobotic project for large-scale artificial swarms. arXiv preprint, 2011. Access mode: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1110.5762
7. Montanier J., Faigl J. Language evolution in swarm robotics: A perspective. Frontiers in Robotics and AI. 2020. Vol. 7. Article No. 12. DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2020.00012
8. Лаврик В., Скідан В., Сукало М., Волівач А., Лебеденко Ю. Використання ІоТ пристроїв для моніторингу стану рослин в сільському господарстві. Інформаційні технології та суспільство. 2025. № 1 (16). С. 116–122. DOI: 10.32689/maup.it.2025.1.15
9. Beni G., Wang J. Swarm Intelligence in Cellular Robotic Systems. In: Robots and Biological Systems: Towards a New Bionics? Berlin: Springer, 1989. P. 703–712. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-58069-7_38
10. Moore R. K., Marxer R., Thill S. Vocal interactivity in–and–between humans, animals, and robots. Frontiers in Robotics and AI. 2016. Vol. 3. Article No. 61. DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2016.00061
11. AlHadithi B. M., Pastor C. CostEffective Localization of Mobile Robots Using Ultrasound Beacons and Differential Time-of-Flight Measurement. Applied Sciences. 2024. Vol. 14, No. 17. Article No. 7597. DOI: 10.3390/app14177597
12. Goel P., Roumeliotis S. I., Sukhatme G. S. Robust Localization Using Relative and Absolute Position Estimates. Proc. IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). 2003. P. 1065–1071. DOI: 10.1109/IROS.2003.124883
13. Kernbach S. et al. Towards applied swarm robotics: current limitations and enablers. Swarm Intelligence. 2021. Vol. 15, No. 4. P. 223–245. DOI: 10.1007/s11721-021-00189-x
14. Li Z., Yu Y., Horoshenkov K. V. A comparison of the performance of four acoustic modulation techniques for robot communication in pipes. The International Journal of Acoustics and Vibration. 2023. Vol. 28, No. 1. P. 98–116. DOI: 10.20855/ijav.2023.28.11930
15. Cyberbotics Ltd. Webots: Open-source robot simulator. URL: https://cyberbotics.com
ISSN 



