NEURAL-DRIVEN HYBRID METHOD FOR OPTIMAL AREA COVERAGE WITH PLACEMENT CONSTRAINTS
Abstract
The article proposes a novel methodology for addressing the Maximum Coverage Location Problem (MCLP) in continuous spaces, incorporating arbitrarily shaped objects, their rotation, and restricted zones for object centers. The problem is formulated as a nonlinear optimization task, where constraints are enforced through a dynamically tuned penalty function driven by a neural network. To enhance computational efficiency, a surrogate neural network approximates the computationally intensive objective function, significantly reducing processing time. The proposed hybrid evaluation strategy integrates precise geometric computations using the Shapely library with Monte Carlo approximations, achieving an optimal balance between accuracy and computational speed. Swarm intelligence algorithms, such as Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), and memetic algorithms, which combine global exploration with local refinement, are employed to navigate the high-dimensional, multi-extremal solution space effectively. The adaptive penalty mechanism, powered by a neural network, enables automatic adjustment of constraint parameters, eliminating the need for manual tuning and enhancing the robustness of the method across varying problem conditions. This approach proves highly effective for complex geometric configurations, where traditional optimization techniques struggle due to the multi-extremal nature of the objective function and placement constraints. The method is scalable and adaptable to diverse object shapes and restricted zone configurations, making it suitable for practical applications in multiple domains, including telecommunications (e.g., optimal placement of base stations), healthcare (e.g., deployment of mobile medical units in crisis scenarios), ecology (e.g., sensor placement for environmental monitoring), and urban planning (e.g., infrastructure design with restricted access zones). The integration of neural network-based adaptive penalties with geometric optimization provides a robust and efficient framework for solving real-world coverage problems. Future prospects include real-time optimization integration with geographic information systems, further refinement through deep neural networks with active learning, and expansion to dynamic environments with time-varying constraints. This approach advances the state-of-the-art in AI-driven optimization, offering a versatile and reliable solution for complex spatial planning challenges.
References
2. Berman O. et al. Facility location: A survey of applications and methods. Springer, 2009. 978 с.
3. Church R. L. The planar maximal covering location problem. Journal of Regional Science. 1984. Vol. 24, № 2. P. 185–201.
4. Matisziw T. C., Murray A. T. Continuous space modeling for location problems. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences. 2009. Vol. 43, № 2. P. 79–97.
5. Cortés J. et al. Coverage control for mobile sensing networks. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation. 2004. Vol. 20, № 2. P. 243–255.
6. Schwager M., Rus D., Slotine J.-J. Decentralized, adaptive coverage control for networked robots. The International Journal of Robotics Research. 2009. Vol. 28, № 7. P. 735–752.
7. Yakovlev S. et al. Continuous maximum coverage location problem with arbitrary shape of service areas and regional demand. Symmetry. 2025. Vol. 17, № 5. P. 676.
8. Yakovlev S., Kartashov O., Podzeha D. Mathematical models and nonlinear optimization in continuous maximum coverage location problem. Computation. 2022. Vol. 10, № 7. P. 119.
9. Yakovlev S., Kartashov O., Mumrienko A. Formalization and solution of the maximum area coverage problem using library Shapely for territory monitoring. Radioelectronic and Computer Systems. 2022. № 2. P. 35–48.
10. Yakovlev S. V. The concept of modeling packing and covering problems using modern computational geometry software. Cybernetics and Systems Analysis. 2023. Vol. 59, № 1. P. 108–119.
11. Kennedy J., Eberhart R. Particle swarm optimization. Proceedings of ICNN'95 – International Conference on Neural Networks. 1995. Vol. 4. P. 1942–1948.
12. Storn R., Price K. Differential evolution – A simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces. Journal of Global Optimization. 1997. Vol. 11, № 4. P. 341–359.
13. Dorigo M., Stützle T. Ant Colony Optimization. MIT Press, 2004. 319 с.
14. Neri F., Cotta C. Memetic algorithms and memetic computing optimization: A literature review. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation. 2012. Vol. 2. P. 1–14.
15. Yang X.-S. Mathematical analysis of nature-inspired algorithms. Neural Computing and Applications. 2018. Vol. 30, № 1. P. 113–119.
16. Mirjalili S. et al. Multi-objective grey wolf optimizer: A novel algorithm for multi-criterion optimization. Expert Systems with Applications. 2016. Vol. 47. P. 106–119.
17. Molina D., Lozano M., Herrera F. Memetic algorithms for continuous optimisation based on local search chains. Evolutionary Computation. 2015. Vol. 23, № 1. P. 1–28.
18. Forrester A., Sóbester A., Keane A. Engineering design via surrogate modelling: A practical guide. John Wiley & Sons, 2008. 228 с.
19. Zaheer M. et al. Deep sets. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 2017. Vol. 30. P. 3391–3401.
20. Jin Y. et al. Data-driven evolutionary optimization: An overview and case studies. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation. 2019. Vol. 23, № 3. P. 442–458.
21. Raissi M., Perdikaris P., Karniadakis G. E. Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. Journal of Computational Physics. 2019. Vol. 378. P. 686–707.
22. Goodfellow I., Bengio Y., Courville A. Deep learning. MIT Press, 2016. 800 с.
23. Zhang J. et al. Queuing search algorithm: A novel metaheuristic algorithm for solving global optimization problems. Applied Soft Computing. 2018. Vol. 67. P. 136–148.
24. Akyildiz I. F. et al. Wireless sensor networks: A survey. Computer Networks. 2002. Vol. 38, № 4. P. 393–422.
25. Low K. H., Dolan J. M., Khosla P. Adaptive multi-robot wide-area exploration and mapping. Autonomous Robots. 2009. Vol. 27, № 2. P. 129–148.
26. Choset H. Coverage for robotics – A survey of recent results. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence. 2001. Vol. 31, № 1–4. P. 113–126.
27. Yakovlev S. et al. Maximum service coverage in business site selection using computer geometry software. Electronics. 2023. Vol. 12, № 10. P. 2329.
28. Yakovlev S. et al. Optimization of mobile medical service locations based on predictive analytics in crisis scenarios. Proceedings of the International Conferences IADIS Information Systems 2025 and E-Society 2025. 2025. P. 538–541.
29. Leichenko K. et al. Assessment of the reliability of wireless sensor networks for forest fire monitoring systems considering fatal combinations of multiple sensor failures. Cybernetics and Systems Analysis. 2025. Vol. 61, № 1. P. 137–147.
30. Skorobohatko S. et al. Architecture and reliability models of hybrid sensor networks for environmental and emergency monitoring systems. Cybernetics and Systems Analysis. 2024. Vol. 60, № 2. P. 293–304.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
ISSN 



