ECOLOGICAL STANDARDIZATION AND CIVIL PROTECTION MANAGEMENT UNDER MARTIAL LAW AT CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE FACILITIES

Keywords: anthropogenic load, ecological standardization, maximum permissible concentrations, civil protection, critical infrastructure, ecological capacity, oil and gas industry, ecological risk

Abstract

Relevance. Under the conditions of full-scale armed aggression against Ukraine, the anthropogenic load on the natural environment has undergone fundamental and catastrophic changes. The traditional planned technogenic impact has transformed into chaotic, massive, and highly toxic pollution of a multimedia nature. In such conditions, the existing static system of ecological standardization, based on sanitary and hygienic maximum permissible concentrations (MPC) and maximum permissible emissions (MPE), has proven methodologically incapable of effectively responding to unpredictable challenges. This creates a critical gap in the national life safety system and limits the ability of civil protection (CP) units to implement scientifically sound operational management of ecological and technogenic risks during the mitigation of attacks on critical infrastructure facilities. Goal. To develop and scientifically substantiate innovative methodological approaches for adapting the anthropogenic load standardization system, as well as to create a conceptual model for its integration with civil protection management mechanisms under martial law and post-conflict recovery (using the example of the oil and gas industry). Methodology. The study utilizes a comprehensive approach combining systemic and risk analysis methods, the theory of territorial ecological capacity, the concept of socio-ecosystem resilience, and principles of mathematical modeling of pollutant dispersion in the atmosphere. Results. The fundamental necessity of implementing flexible, multi-level standardization tools has been proven. The implementation of a mechanism for temporary emergency standards (MPC-EMERGENCY), adapted similarly to international AEGL and ERPG standards, is proposed for use directly in active combat zones and areas of critical infrastructure damage. A concept of a unified digital management contour has been developed, in which real-time local environmental monitoring data, processed using geographic information systems (GIS) and artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms, serve as automatic triggers for activating specific CP protocols (evacuation, sheltering, zone isolation). Additionally, the concept of transitional standardization (MPC-TRANSITION) for the safe management of destruction waste and land reclamation is substantiated. Conclusions. It is proven that adaptive ecological standardization must evolve from a passive tool for recording environmental damage into a proactive, preventative management mechanism within the civil protection system. Integrating ecological criteria into safety protocols will minimize sanitary and hygienic losses among the population and rescuers, and ensure the sustainable post-conflict recovery of territories in accordance with European “Build Back Better” principles

References

1. Погребняк В. Г., Перкун І. В., Вишнікіна О. В., Погребняк А. В. Від охорони праці до комплексної безпеки: стратегії інтеграції цивільного захисту в корпоративні системи управління. Системи та технології. 2025. № 2 (69). С. 289–293. https://doi.org/10.32782/2521-6643-2025-2-70.32
2. Шевчук В. Я., Саталкіна О. В. Екологічне нормування та управління ризиками. Київ : Наукова думка, 2021. 384 с.
3. Боголюбов В. М. Еколого-техногенні ризики та безпека життєдіяльності: інтегрований підхід. Київ: Кондор, 2022. 512 с.
4. Скрипчук П. П. Інтеграція Цивільного захисту та екологічного моніторингу в Україні: проблеми та шляхи вирішення. Київ : НІСД, 2022. 180 с.
5. Pogrebnyak V., Kondrat O., Pogrebnyak A., Perkun I. Transforming Occupational Safety and Civil Defense: Wartime Challenges and Solutions. Academic Journal Industrial Machine Building Civil Engineering. 2025. Vol. 64, No. 1. P. 13–23. https://doi.org/10.26906/znp.2025.64.4034
6. Погребняк В. Г., Кондрат О. Р., Перкун І. В., Погребняк А. В. Моделювання професійних і воєнних ризиків в системі безпеки праці та цивільного захисту на об’єктах нафтогазової галузі. Прикарпатський вісник НТШ. 2025. № 21, T. 79, 427–438. https://doi.org/10.31471/2304-7399-2025-21(79)-427-438
7. Перкун І. В., Погребняк В. Г., Погребняк А. В. Принципи інтеграції екологічного нормування та стандартів безпеки життєдіяльності в стратегії постконфліктного відновлення України. Системи та технології. 2026. Vol. 71, No. 1. С. 156–163. https://doi.org/10.32782/2521-6643-2026-1-71.20
8. Погребняк В. Г., Погребняк А. В. Сучасні підходи до управління ризиками в системі безпеки на підприємствах. Системи та технології. 2026. Vol. 71, No. 1. С. 164–175. https://doi.org/10.32782/2521-6643-2026-1-71.21
9. Pogrebnyak A. V., Perkun I. V., Pogrebnyak V. G., Shymanskyi V. Ya. Improvement of labour safety and safety of life activities by increasing the efficiency of water fire extinguishing systems. Системи та технології. 2025. Vol. 69, No. 1. P. 187–193. https://doi.org/10.32782/2521-6643-2025-1-69.22
10. United Nations Environment Programme. Assessment of Environmental Damage in Conflict Zones: Methodological Guidelines. Geneva: UNEP Publications, 2023. URL: https://www.unep.org/resources/methodological-guidelines-environmental-damage-conflict-zones
11. World Bank Group. Guidelines for Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Integrating Environmental Sustainability (Build Back Better). Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group Publications, 2020.
12. Bilgen S., Büyükyıldız M. Post-Conflict Environmental Assessment and Reconstruction Policies: Lessons for the Green Recovery. Journal of Environmental Management. 2022. Vol. 320. 116035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116035
13. Кодекс цивільного захисту України : Закон України від 02.10.2012 № 5403-VI. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/5403-17
14. Про охорону навколишнього природного середовища : Закон України від 25.06.1991 № 1264-XII. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1264-12
15. Lui J., Zhang Y. AI-Driven Geospatial Modeling for Adaptive Environmental Regulation and Disaster Response. Environmental Science & Technology. 2024. Vol. 58, No. 10. P. 4200–4210. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c01234
16. European Commission. The European Green Deal. Brussels: European Commission, COM/2019/640 final, 2019. URL: https://www.eea.europa.eu/policy-documents/com-2019-640-final
Published
2026-05-30
How to Cite
Perkun , I. V., Pogrebnyak , V. G., Tsymbal , B. M., & Pogrebnyak , A. V. (2026). ECOLOGICAL STANDARDIZATION AND CIVIL PROTECTION MANAGEMENT UNDER MARTIAL LAW AT CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE FACILITIES. Systems and Technologies, 72(2), 282-287. https://doi.org/10.32782/2521-6643-2026-2-72.34
Section
МЕНЕДЖМЕНТ